Re: Kingston Sup****t Group - PANGS

"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:6d3i3uFkilbU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Royden" <rkading@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:rkading-494CB2.21420102072008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> In article <486b4751.10648562@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, (Matt Probert)
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Samara <pangs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> >There is overwhelming evidence to sup****t my belief that adoption is
>>> >detrimental to the emotional health of both adoptees and birth
>>> >mothers..............
>>>
>>> I probably shouldn't respond but....
>>>
>>> As an adult, who was adopted at birth, and perhaps more pertinently
>>> was informed of his status when under five years old, I know that I
>>> have suffered emotional health difficulties as a result.
>>>
>>> whether it was the adoption, or the cur***stances of the adoption I
>>> could not say for certain. Perhaps if I was never aware of my status I
>>> should not have suffered as I did, I can not say.
>>>
>> Is it possible that your emotional health difficulties were a result of
>> an inherited condition and had nothing to do with your adoption?
>>
>> I was also adopted at 13 mos. of age, and told about my adoption when I
>> was under 5 yrs of age but I had loving parents who did not make me
feel
>> unwanted, or to feel that I had been unwanted by my birthmother, or
give
>> me any reason to have emotional problems about it.  I never gave it a
>> thought about why I had been adopted, but only knew that I had a home
>> and a family.
>
> That pretty much sounds like my experience as well, except that I was 
> adopted at birth.  All my emotional problems came later when I was 
> reuniting with my birth family, who turned out to be quite a kooky bunch

> ;)
> -- 
> Robyn
> Resident Witchypoo
> BAAWA Knight!
> #1557
> If you can't be a good example....
> You'll just have to be a horrible warning.

So, you come by being a nut case honestly!!

>