> All I see are responses to the original post. =A0Where is the full text?
=
=A0I
> do know that boyfriends, especially live-in boyfriends accounts for a
> significant number of ***ual and physical abuse cases against children.
> When will people learn that live-in relation****ps are deadly and stupid!
I once worked in a convenience grocery store that was
near a police station that was closed for some reason.
The store was robbed every single week, aboutt
half of the time using a real or fake snub nose pistol,
half of the time knife.
It was in a white neighborhood, but a "project" was
a few miles away. During the time I was there it
was never robbed by a white person. I asked people
who had worked there longer, they had never been
robbed by a white person.
It was politically incorrect to watch black people
more, but it was common sense in that situation.
Simple matter of survival.
The Police there did concealed stakeouts of several
convenience stores, including the one I was at.
It's very strange working a cash register knowing that
if somebody tries to rob the store they were
going to get their head blown off right there.
A few robbers died, the robbery rate plummeted
and eventually the Police station was manned again.
Mike, What would you do with those statistics?
Of course nonrelated caretakers are more dangerous.
Do you propose that mothers should never make
efforts to find a step parent?
Would you ban all step parenthhood?
Just presume they're all guilty based on the statistics?
You wouldn't apply that to black people would you?
When are people going to learn?
Isn't that a misapplication of statistics?
Are you a bureaucrat?
Some of them think that way.
Miraculously never about foster care, however.
THOSE stats are to be omitted, gerrymandered,
selected out, or explained away somehow.
Full text in message at this link.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/msg/b6=
9270d7d9703ea2
|
