IG > You've demonstrated conclusively that I am
IG > a Usenet veteran whose interests range from
IG > violence-free child-rearing to religion, politics,
IG > abortion, current events and a host of other topics.
G > Ivan thinks that being an INTERNET
G > a-hole on many subjects makes him
G > a well rounded individual? =A0LOL
KW > Since you have cornered the market on domestic
KW > violence and child abuse, he had to pick something.
You could teach him about garage burglary, Kent.
G > And if Ivan already raised three kids
G > then WHY would he be so damned
G > interested in "violence free child rearing"??
KW > Just a guess on my part, but it's
KW > possible the method worked well
KW > for him, and he would like to see others use it.
LK > It's possible I suppose, but his immature
LK > way of doing things suggests alternate motivations.
LK >
LK > Notice how Spanky doesn't even try to
LK > intellectualize the argument in any way.
LK >=A0He states his case, provides some feminist
LK > bull**** to go along with it, then goes
LK > straight for the insult and the accusation
LK > of ***ual deviancy against anybody who
LK > argues for or against his position. =A0He's
LK > probably using one of them random insult
LK > generators.
LK > (google it if you need to know) No need
LK > to prove anything he says and no attempt
LK > to convince anybody else of his position.
LK >=A0Just be an asshole and call it good.
LK >
LK > All he wants to do is fight about it. =A0He'd
LK > probably fight about it with people who
LK > agree with him all the way.
He'd probably switch sides if too many
people agreed with him! He has to be the lightning rod.
He refused to give a backgrounder also.
I haven't bothered to read up on his older posts.
The ones from his recent/current posting identity
the last two months was all I looked at.
Firemonkey, Do I need your permission to look
up Ivan's old posts and mention contradictions,
or will you consider that stalking, ya retard?
KW >=A0I don't see it as a realistic goal, if that
KW > is his goal, but he's not doing any harm by trying.
Who said he was doing harm?
Then again, you haven't said much about Ivan's
"harmful ***" definition that conveniently
defines adult-child *** as OK.
LK > It almost seems like you're sticking up for Greg there Ron.
Ron > Sick, aint it. =A0"even a broken clock is right twice a day".
G > Damn, Coming from Ron, that's high praise indeed! =A0LOL
G > I'd like to see the two grouches go at it.
G > They could fight over whose crusade is the most noble.
KW > Anything to distract from your life of abusing those
KW > you see as weaker than yourself, right?
Do I see you as weaker than myself, Kent?
Do you see yourself as weaker than me, Kent?
Have you told Ivan about your garage burglary FELONY and appeal, Kent?
|
