On Aug 17, 2:47=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> G > Remember that you once said (paraphrased)
> G > Where there's smoke there's fire.
>
> DS > That was said in reference to what
> DS > you admitted you did to Lisa
> DS > Watkins' daughter.
>
> G > You say. =A0 But you conveniently forgot
> G > that with 15 child abuse investigations
> G > yourself, and 5 FOUNDEDS, the smoke/fire
> G > rationale applies to YOU even better!
> G > (And with MULTIPLE re****ters, to boot!)
>
> DS > No, it doesn't.
>
> DS > Because I've never admitted abuse or neglect... while you did.
>
> Don't you mean I've admitted to things that
> YOU and the CASEWORKERS have CHOSEN
> to pretend are abuse or neglect?
>
> Show me where the LAW defines what I did as neglect.
> Otherwise it's just a bunch of *****y ATTITUDE on your part, Dan!
>
> Not to mention that the very nature of the
> [ Where there's smoke there's fire ] BS you
> used is an obvious FALLACY.
>
> DS > That is the explanation for the smoke/fire comparison.
>
> Do you honestly think nothing you ever did
> could be defined by somebody ELSE as abuse
> or neglect?
>
> From what you say, Dan, that did happen to you.
>
> And the issue of admitting to something that somebody ELSE
> defines as evil really has little to do with the fact that
> people called on FIFTEEN PLUS abuse re****ts on you.
Re****ts that were fabrications on their face or re****ts that should
have been unfounded because there was no credible evidence to sup****t
a positive finding.
As opposed to all the evidence found and admissions you made in the
investigation that caused Lisa Watkins' daughter to be removed.
> You were investigated for child abuse FIFTEEN PLUS times.
> I was investigated TWICE ever, 7 years apart.
> For YOU to try this [ smoke/fire ] fallacy on ME was absurd!
>
> You're still defending the indefensible, ala Kent Wills.
When was the last time I defended Kent Willis?
|
