On Aug 18, 4:31=A0pm, "Condoleezza HaHa" <condolee...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:56:53 -0400, Dragon's Girl
<bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=
=A0
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 18, 11:38 am, Firemonkey <firemonke...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Aug 18, 12:19 pm, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > On Aug 18, 8:49 am, Firemonkey <firemonke...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > > On Aug 18, 9:47 am, Firemonkey <firemonke...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > > > On Aug 18, 5:40 am, "Condoleezza HaHa"
<condolee...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:18:05 -0400, Greegor =A0
> >> <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> > > > > > On Aug 17, 9:58 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=
=A0
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> On Aug 17, 1:12 am, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/=
....
>
> >> > > > > >> > On Aug 16, 11:39 pm, "Dragon's Girl" =A0
> >> <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >> > > On Aug 16, 9:49 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > On Aug 15, 8:01 pm, "Dragon's Girl" =A0
> >> <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > > On Aug 15, 1:43 pm, LK <Patis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > > >http://millennialsw.wordpress.com/
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > > Here is my opinion of the statements made in the =
=A0
> >> blog you link
> >> > > > > >> to:
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > > Good, fine, someone, anyone, is gay. =A0I got
nothi=
ng =A0
> >> against gay
> >> > > > > >> > > > > people. =A0They don't bother me, I don't bother
the=
m. =A0
> >> I find
> >> > > > > >> some of
> >> > > > > >> > > > > the flaming femme guys a little offensive in their
=
=A0
> >> downright
> >> > > > > >> hate for
> >> > > > > >> > > > > women (mad because my breasts are real?, sorry!),
=
=A0
> >> their
> >> > > > > >> demeanor, and
> >> > > > > >> > > > > their attitudes, but other than that, I don't have
=
=A0
> >> to tolerate
> >> > > > > >> it, so
> >> > > > > >> > > > > don't care.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > > Now, where this gay parenting things comes to
piece=
s =A0
> >> in my most
> >> > > > > >> humble
> >> > > > > >> > > > > opinion is here: =A0If you have a kid, and you're
g=
ay, =A0
> >> regardless
> >> > > > > >> of
> >> > > > > >> > > > > what your ***ual preferences AFTER you have that =
=A0
> >> kid, it's
> >> > > > > >> still your
> >> > > > > >> > > > > kid, and still your right to rear that kid.
=A0Even=
if =A0
> >> you choose
> >> > > > > >> a life
> >> > > > > >> > > > > partner of the same *** to help you rear your kid.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > > When you take a child and place them in a same ***
=
=A0
> >> home that is
> >> > > > > >> a BIG
> >> > > > > >> > > > > NO NO.
> >> > > > > >> > > > > Why? =A0Not because I have a preference against
gay=
s, =A0
> >> but because
> >> > > > > >> the
> >> > > > > >> > > > > mandate of DFS, who removes children from their
=A0
> >> families, is to
> >> > > > > >> place
> >> > > > > >> > > > > the child in a setting MOST LIKE THE HOME OF THEIR
=
=A0
> >> BIOLOGICAL
> >> > > > > >> FAMILY.
> >> > > > > >> > > > > That means in regard to the *** of the parents,
=A0
> >> religion,
> >> > > > > >> political
> >> > > > > >> > > > > views, heritage, etc.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > > If DFS removes a child from the family home, and =
=A0
> >> that home has
> >> > > > > >> one
> >> > > > > >> > > > > mother, one father, and both are hetero***ual,
then=
=A0
> >> it is DFS's
> >> > > > > >> > > > > mandate to place the child in a home exactly like
=
=A0
> >> the one they
> >> > > > > >> came
> >> > > > > >> > > > > from. =A0Not in a home with two female parents,
not=
in =A0
> >> a home
> >> > > > > >> with two
> >> > > > > >> > > > > male parents. =A0If the child comes from a home
whe=
re =A0
> >> both
> >> > > > > >> parents are
> >> > > > > >> > > > > the same ***, then it is DFS's mandate to place
the=
=A0
> >> child in a
> >> > > > > >> home
> >> > > > > >> > > > > where both parents are the same ***.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > > I know that will never happen, but that's the way
=
=A0
> >> it's supposed
> >> > > > > >> to be.
>
> >> > > > > >> > G > I have said this myself, Betty, but I didn't see you
> >> > > > > >> > G > chiming in with your agreement! =A0 Why was that?
>
> >> > > > > >> > BW > Because I didn't see you say it?
>
> >> > > > > >> > How much ya wanna bet you QUOTED it?
>
> >> > > > > >> Word for word? =A0Show me.
>
> >> > > > > >> > BW > You see me saying it now, so what's the beef?
> >> > > > > >> > BW > It's not as if I'm disputing, is it?
>
> >> > > > > >> > It was politically convenient for you to stand idly by
> >> > > > > >> > and remain quiet when I said the same thing!
>
> >> > > > > >> So, what you are saying is that I had some kind of =A0
> >> politically
> >> > > > > >> motivated reason to have not commented (remain quiet) on =
=A0
> >> something you
> >> > > > > >> said at some unknown time in regard to some unknown =A0
> >> subject? =A0You're
> >> > > > > >> joking, right?
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > Another way to describe it is respect for the the
=A0
> >> family's
> >> > > > > >> culture.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > I even mentioned a story the kids of a CLERGYMAN
> >> > > > > >> > > > in MO (YOUR STATE) were put in a GAY home.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > The truth is that the agency geeks actually DO
> >> > > > > >> > > > attempt ""social engineering"" like taking kids
> >> > > > > >> > > > from a straight laced anti-gay home and placing
> >> > > > > >> > > > them into a gay home to ""correct"" that.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > In that MO case, the Clergy and their
> >> > > > > >> > > > followers raised some hell anf got a
> >> > > > > >> > > > politician in MO to raise some hell as well.
> >> > > > > >> > > > The perverse placement was changed.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > The agency made a PUBLIC RELATIONS boo boo
> >> > > > > >> > > > when they messed with those people!
> >> > > > > >> > > > The agencies do seem to be more on the side of
> >> > > > > >> > > > allowing little boys to be indoctrinated into the
> >> > > > > >> > > > gay community (pederasty) than finding a way
> >> > > > > >> > > > to weed out those gays (pederasts) from gays
> >> > > > > >> > > > who are NOT pederasts. =A0They may be two
> >> > > > > >> > > > slightly different lifestyles, but the agencies seem
> >> > > > > >> > > > unable to tell pederasts from other gays.
>
> >> > > > > >> > BW > Do you have some foolproof method that
> >> > > > > >> > BW > you could recommend that would
> >> > > > > >> > BW > accomplish that for social services?
>
> >> > > > > >> > I don't think they can find their way out of a paper
bag.
> >> > > > > >> > But they REPRESENT themselves as competent!
>
> >> > > > > >> Funny how you didn't answer the question. =A0Do you have
so=
me =A0
> >> fool proof
> >> > > > > >> method for weeding out those who should not foster
children=
=A0
> >> that could
> >> > > > > >> be implemented by DFS to ensure the safety of our children
=
=A0
> >> placed in
> >> > > > > >> care?
> >> > > > > >> A simple yes, or no would suffice.
>
> >> > > > > >> > I've said many times that the Child Protection INDUSTRY
> >> > > > > >> > needs to weed out the perverts among their OWN ranks
> >> > > > > >> > before they point any fingers at anybody else!
>
> >> > > > > >> And they may do so by what method, Greg?
>
> >> > > > > >> > I've also countered *****ing about "homophobia"
> >> > > > > >> > by pointing out that "homophilia" is an ill as well!
>
> >> > > > > >> > CPS being "groupies"/patronizing gays/lesbians
> >> > > > > >> > is just as wrong as being phobic about them.
>
> >> > > > > >> Huh? =A0Did you read that before you posted it?
>
> >> > > > > >> > And CPS has a long track record of homophilia
> >> > > > > >> > and affinity for gays, and that is likely part of their
> >> > > > > >> > problem with numbers of PEDERASTS within the
> >> > > > > >> > Child Protection INDUSTRY itself.
>
> >> > > > > >> I am sure that the first question on the application after
=
=A0
> >> 'address'
> >> > > > > >> is '***ual preference' with a little note in parenthesis =
=A0
> >> saying that
> >> > > > > >> homo***uals get first consideration. <rolling eyes>
=A0Only=
=A0
> >> you could
> >> > > > > >> come up with such a boogie man out to get you theory.
>
> >> > > > > >> > Give me an AMEN Betty! =A0 =A0LOL- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > > > > Is that the best you could come up with after Kane's
> >> > > > > > back channel coaching of you he also sent to me?
>
> >> > > > > > Did you know he sent it to me, Betty?
>
> >> > > > > > At first I thought these e-mails I get from Kane
> >> > > > > > were a result of his mental decline, but sometimes
> >> > > > > > I wonder if he deliberately sends them to me.
>
> >> > > > > > Did you get Kane's memo on how to respond here?
>
> >> > > > > I wonder why Don/Kane/d;geezer goes koo-koo every time =A0
> >> homo***uals are
> >> > > > > mentioned? =A0Wonder if it's a family affair. lol
> >> > > > > ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**-Hidequotedtext-
>
> >> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > > > What are you talking about =A0Liza?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > > Kane hasn't posted here for months. WTF?
>
> >> > It's the Kanespiracy Theory again.
> >> > That reminds me, did you send in your cult dues yet?
> >> > <tapping foot> =A0I'm waiting.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> LOL, I paid them twice!!
>
> > Yeah, yeah, 'check's in the mail', I hear that line all the time.
> > All hail supreme master Kane, owner of the tinfoil hat penetrating
> > mind control unit and super duper GI Joe with the kung fu grip.
>
> Don't forget his he-man moves, calling a grieving grandmother a smelly =
=A0
> **** -- or the he-man move that made him the legend he believes he is -
=
=A0
> spamming his community's most vulnerable children to usenet perverts.
>
> Now he's directing the debate via backchannel -- bwahahahahahahah
> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**-
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Gee, I wonder why he would say something like that! Could you post a
link to it so readers could see the context in which it was said.
|
