On Aug 21, 7:49 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> KW > I'm jealous. Kane never writes me.
> KW > What did I do wrong?
>
> G > On the other hand, as senile as he's getting,
> G > there's no telling what kind of crazy stuff he might do.
>
> DS > He might, in his professional capacity, alert
> DS > law enforcement and CPS in Iowa of your
> DS > YEARS of denial of your inappropriate
> DS > behavior with Lisa Watkins' daughter.
> DS >
> DS > Who knows what crazy stuff THEY might do!
>
> G > Dan, I keep telling you to get an update!
> G > You wouldn't believe me if I told you.
> G > Kinda like when you ""discovered"" that Ken actually got
> G > paid to do some research for the state of Utah.
> G > It's MUCH BETTER if you find out the information
> G > you would deny ON YOUR OWN!
>
> G > Actually, Considering what has taken place
> G > I think it would be amusing as hell if Don
> G > was to call the caseworker, get an update and
> G > try to stir up some ****.
>
> G > Let's just say that my family is NO LONGER
> G > afraid of Iowa DHS Child Protective services.
>
> G > I've got them walking into street signs and
> G > growing beards trying to disguise themselves.
>
> G > In some cases if I yelled BOO! they would
> G > need a change of underwear.
>
> G > I tried to tell you that things have not
> G > gone well for them.
>
> G > Why have you refused to get an update, Dan?
>
> BW > Do you think they'd still feel that way if
> BW > they knew about your obsession with my grandson?
>
> G > Betty, If I was a perv grooving on your YouTube videos
> G > wouldn't that make you the ****ographer?
>
> BW > I don't have any youtube videos,
>
> Didn't you move your Google videos over when Google bought YouTube?
Is this going to be your excuse?
>
> BW > so I wouldn't know.
> BW > And, nothing that I do have is ****ographic in nature.
> BW > However some freaks dig on bizarre **** like kids in bathing
> suits.
> BW > I can't help that. So, no.
>
> BW > Your statements to the little girl who
> BW > posted here about her unfaithful mother?
>
> G > What about my statements?
>
> BW > You should go back and re-read the thread if you don't know.
> BW > Wait. Maybe that won't help. You don't see anything wrong with
> BW > anything you say, or do.
>
> Apparently you didn't either or you woulda posted a LINK!
Link schmink.
I read it, and I don't have time to look for it for you. If you can't
remember what you said that's your tough ****.
>
> BW > Do you think that they'd fear you
> BW > if they knew you'd spent the last
> BW > seven years telling this group
> BW > how Lisa's daughter manipulated you?
>
> G > Since I've never said that, it would be hilarious if
> G > they took your word for it and started something.
>
> BW > Yeah, you did.
> BW > You said that she was being manipulative by wetting herself.
>
> Got a LINK to where I said that?
Get it yourself.
Better yet, get Lisa to get it.
>
> G > They're like dogs who poked their nose into a ****cupine.
> G > They aren't likely to try that again soon.
> G >
> G > But this ol' ****cupine would be glad to OBLIGE THEM.
>
> BW > I know, I know..they're shakin' in their boots.
> BW > Riiiiiiiight.
>
> Hey, It was YOUR IDEA to call in false
> re****ts based on newsgroup *****ing!
Who said anything about calling in false re****ts?
I asked you if I needed to alert the authorities and get a restraining
order against you in the name of my son.
I didn't say anything about false re****ts.
You're just as much a liar now as you were seven years ago.
>
> Frankly I would SO ENJOY telling DHS how
> to self procreate that it would be hilarious!
Call 'em up and tell 'em then!
>
> G > The ****cupine was an early American icon, too.
|
