http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/browse_frm/thread/ea0a09a494f5177d
News stories where CPS screws up are abundant and severe.
This is not the best example of where CPS screwed up.
It seems to be some sort of sales pitch to try to
enlarge funding and authority to enlarge CPS
and their intrusions.
DS > From the info in the article Rawls
DS > was probably 18 or older at the
DS >time CPS removed his younger brother.
BT > Are you a CPS booster then?
Yes, Dan is. He LIES about it but he is.
Why did you come to that conclusion so quickly though
when all Dan pointed out was that this Dad was not
legally a subject of the previous Child Abuse case?
I can't shake the wierd feeling that this was
some kind of GAME about forcing me to defend
an opponent, Dan, for such a blatant fact.
NWA, I disagree with the position you took
that CPS agencies don't make cases lightly.
CPS agencies commonly DO waste a lot of
time on cases made over trivia, while at the
same time, they decide NOT to make cases where
tyhere have been numerous calls and AMPLE
evidence. Their mistakes do not cut just one way.
Their bias on cases seems almost schitzophrenic
in this way. Ignoring hard core blatant cases
while obsessing about spending massive amounts
of time and resources on cases without real merit.
DS > CPS sucks and rarely comes to the proper conclusion.
Again, Dan said something that is TRUE.
The problem we have is that Dan and CPS
know that in order to burrow into the
cause of family rights against CPS, you
have to say things that make you appear to
be on the family rights side.
Dan says things that ON THE SURFACE make
him appear to be in the family rights cause.
But dig a little deeper and you find that
Dan has said a lot of things and taken
positions that contradict this.
Dan has been kicked out of several
Family Rights groups online and off.
One of his biggest online references,
Kane (Pa****okenkookoo) claimed to be
on the side of Family Rights, but
similarly his deeper positions gave
him away. Actually he was spotted
as a caseworker almost immediately.
He lied about it for YEARS and when
he was finally ID'd as a former
CPS caseworker and a rabid ****ll for
the Child Protection INDUSTRY,
he scampered away.
Before Kane was outed, though, Dan
and Kane used to post profuse TESTIMONIALS
for each other, it was a MUTUAL thing,
and some referred to it as them sucking
each other off in public.
This is part of why the PRO CPS group
of posters Dan is allied with is called
a bunch of "system sucks".
Several of them are BENEFICIARIES of the
Child Protection INDUSTRY somehow.
They operate as a pack and so are sometimes
refererred to as the hyena pack as well.
Lately their dishonesty has backfired
on them SEVERELY in several instances.
Yes, CPS sucks, they screw up BOTH ways,
but this news story is NOT the best example
of CPS screwups, as it is.
Now if you found out that this Dad and the
family was under CPS supervision, or that
there were many re****ts and ample evidence
but CPS took no action, (yes, there are stories
like that or worse!) then this story would
take on a whole new dimension.
In fact, WITHOUT THOSE, this article sup****ts
such a weak strain of criticism of CPS that
it could have been posted to water down
REAL criticism. (And paint parents as evil.)
Buel, You're on the Family Rights side, right?
Why did you use such a flawed and WEAK
article when there are others that much
more blatantly lead to criticism of CPS?
|
