On Aug 26, 3:38=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Aug 17, 9:22=A0pm, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 17, 8:18 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 17, 9:58 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 17, 1:12 am, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > >
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-servic=
es/...
>
> > > > > On Aug 16, 11:39 pm, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrot=
e:
>
> > > > > > On Aug 16, 9:49 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Aug 15, 8:01 pm, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
w=
rote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Aug 15, 1:43 pm, LK <Patis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > >http://millennialsw.wordpress.com/
>
> > > > > > > > Here is my opinion of the statements made in the blog you
l=
ink to:
>
> > > > > > > > Good, fine, someone, anyone, is gay. =A0I got nothing
again=
st gay
> > > > > > > > people. =A0They don't bother me, I don't bother them. =A0I
=
find some of
> > > > > > > > the flaming femme guys a little offensive in their
downrigh=
t hate for
> > > > > > > > women (mad because my breasts are real?, sorry!), their
dem=
eanor, and
> > > > > > > > their attitudes, but other than that, I don't have to
toler=
ate it, so
> > > > > > > > don't care.
>
> > > > > > > > Now, where this gay parenting things comes to pieces in my
=
most humble
> > > > > > > > opinion is here: =A0If you have a kid, and you're gay,
rega=
rdless of
> > > > > > > > what your ***ual preferences AFTER you have that kid, it's
=
still your
> > > > > > > > kid, and still your right to rear that kid. =A0Even if you
=
choose a life
> > > > > > > > partner of the same *** to help you rear your kid.
>
> > > > > > > > When you take a child and place them in a same *** home
tha=
t is a BIG
> > > > > > > > NO NO.
> > > > > > > > Why? =A0Not because I have a preference against gays, but
b=
ecause the
> > > > > > > > mandate of DFS, who removes children from their families,
i=
s to place
> > > > > > > > the child in a setting MOST LIKE THE HOME OF THEIR
BIOLOGIC=
AL FAMILY.
> > > > > > > > That means in regard to the *** of the parents, religion,
p=
olitical
> > > > > > > > views, heritage, etc.
>
> > > > > > > > If DFS removes a child from the family home, and that home
=
has one
> > > > > > > > mother, one father, and both are hetero***ual, then it is
D=
FS's
> > > > > > > > mandate to place the child in a home exactly like the one
t=
hey came
> > > > > > > > from. =A0Not in a home with two female parents, not in a
ho=
me with two
> > > > > > > > male parents. =A0If the child comes from a home where both
=
parents are
> > > > > > > > the same ***, then it is DFS's mandate to place the child
i=
n a home
> > > > > > > > where both parents are the same ***.
>
> > > > > > > > I know that will never happen, but that's the way it's
supp=
osed to be.
>
> > > > > G > I have said this myself, Betty, but I didn't see you
> > > > > G > chiming in with your agreement! =A0 Why was that?
>
> > > > > BW > Because I didn't see you say it?
>
> > > > > How much ya wanna bet you QUOTED it?
>
> > > > Word for word? =A0Show me.
>
> > > > > BW > You see me saying it now, so what's the beef?
> > > > > BW > It's not as if I'm disputing, is it?
>
> > > > > It was politically convenient for you to stand idly by
> > > > > and remain quiet when I said the same thing!
>
> > > > So, what you are saying is that I had some kind of politically
> > > > motivated reason to have not commented (remain quiet) on something
=
you
> > > > said at some unknown time in regard to some unknown subject?
=A0You=
're
> > > > joking, right?
>
> > > > > > > Another way to describe it is respect for the the family's
cu=
lture.
>
> > > > > > > I even mentioned a story the kids of a CLERGYMAN
> > > > > > > in MO (YOUR STATE) were put in a GAY home.
>
> > > > > > > The truth is that the agency geeks actually DO
> > > > > > > attempt ""social engineering"" like taking kids
> > > > > > > from a straight laced anti-gay home and placing
> > > > > > > them into a gay home to ""correct"" that.
>
> > > > > > > In that MO case, the Clergy and their
> > > > > > > followers raised some hell anf got a
> > > > > > > politician in MO to raise some hell as well.
> > > > > > > The perverse placement was changed.
>
> > > > > > > The agency made a PUBLIC RELATIONS boo boo
> > > > > > > when they messed with those people!
> > > > > > > The agencies do seem to be more on the side of
> > > > > > > allowing little boys to be indoctrinated into the
> > > > > > > gay community (pederasty) than finding a way
> > > > > > > to weed out those gays (pederasts) from gays
> > > > > > > who are NOT pederasts. =A0They may be two
> > > > > > > slightly different lifestyles, but the agencies seem
> > > > > > > unable to tell pederasts from other gays.
>
> > > > > BW > Do you have some foolproof method that
> > > > > BW > you could recommend that would
> > > > > BW > accomplish that for social services?
>
> > > > > I don't think they can find their way out of a paper bag.
> > > > > But they REPRESENT themselves as competent!
>
> > > > Funny how you didn't answer the question. =A0Do you have some fool
=
proof
> > > > method for weeding out those who should not foster children that
co=
uld
> > > > be implemented by DFS to ensure the safety of our children placed
i=
n
> > > > care?
> > > > A simple yes, or no would suffice.
>
> > > > > I've said many times that the Child Protection INDUSTRY
> > > > > needs to weed out the perverts among their OWN ranks
> > > > > before they point any fingers at anybody else!
>
> > > > And they may do so by what method, Greg?
>
> > > > > I've also countered *****ing about "homophobia"
> > > > > by pointing out that "homophilia" is an ill as well!
>
> > > > > CPS being "groupies"/patronizing gays/lesbians
> > > > > is just as wrong as being phobic about them.
>
> > > > Huh? =A0Did you read that before you posted it?
>
> > > > > And CPS has a long track record of homophilia
> > > > > and affinity for gays, and that is likely part of their
> > > > > problem with numbers of PEDERASTS within the
> > > > > Child Protection INDUSTRY itself.
>
> > > > I am sure that the first question on the application after
'address=
'
> > > > is '***ual preference' with a little note in parenthesis saying
tha=
t
> > > > homo***uals get first consideration. <rolling eyes> =A0Only you
cou=
ld
> > > > come up with such a boogie man out to get you theory.
>
> > > > > Give me an AMEN Betty! =A0 =A0LOL- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > Is that the best you could come up with after Kane's
> > > back channel coaching of you he also sent to me?
>
> > > Did you know he sent it to me, Betty?
>
> > > At first I thought these e-mails I get from Kane
> > > were a result of his mental decline, but sometimes
> > > I wonder if he deliberately sends them to me.
>
> > > Did you get Kane's memo on how to respond here?
>
> > Greg, he only sent you two, and I know very well that they were sent
> > to you on purpose, and why.
> > I was just wondering how long it would take you to start spouting off
> > about it.
>
> BW > Is that the longest you ever kept a 'secret'?
>
> Walking in Memphis! =A0LOL
>
> How long did I keep that one, Betty?
Was that a secret, Greg?
Why are you stalking my grandson and myself, Greg?
|
