On Aug 28, 7:16=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Kathleen: =A0Don't forget that the Child Protection INDUSTRY
> uses it's own failures to lobby for more money, over and over.
> Be warned that even some of those law suits that look like
> they're beating up on the Child Protection INDUSTRY
> actually benefit that very same industry by loudly
> pointing out shortfalls, failings, etc. and the
> solution to every problem is represented as throwing
> more money at it.
The money isn't paid by insurance companies?
> By the way, that's very much a liberal left wing
> sort of agenda. =A0 While the conservatives you
> hate so much have tolerated CPS or failed to
> put it in check, at least conservatives are
> ideologically supposed to be against the
> socialist workfare that is CPS. =A0They fail to put
> it in check, but at least idealogically
> they should.
But they don't.
So what's your point, grag?
> The political LEFT, however, is all in favor of
> larger government, and it's ideology places
> it in strong SUP****T of what the Child Protection
> INDUSTRY does. =A0They are staunchly sup****ted by
> the UNIONS that the caseworkers belong to, for
> example.
>
> Right Wing caseworkers are extremely rare and
> would be seen by most other caseworkers
> as wolves in the chicken house, so the few
> right wing caseworkers are generally not
> openly or publicly so.
And???
> In your political partisan moments have
> you ever noticed that none of the Democrat
> politicians you have contacted have done
> squat for you?
But the republicans have?
> Democrats talk a lot about upholding the
> US Constitution, but the Constitution is
> and has been a right wing ideal for ages.
> ""Constitutionalists"" who are written off
> as kooks tend to be right wingers.
And???
> The subject title you posted under here
> is about a Donald L. Fisher who is a
> former Oregon Child Protection caseworker.
Wrong.
He taught cl***** for foster parents.
BTW I may have mentioned this before, someone I know has a sister who
works directly for CPS.
She has a name tag with CPS on it.
And all she does is drive people to and from visitations and court.
Is she a CPS case worker?
> He posted for YEARS swearing that he was
> not, but his really OLD posts gave it
> away. =A0He was a state "Child Welfare worker"
> which is what is commonly referred to as
> a Child Protection caseworker.
Wrong as usual, grag.
> (They feel the term "caseworker" is demeaning.)
How do you know that?
> Don's a strange duck, but what did you think
> the odds were of him being a Republican
> or a Libertarian? =A0 Did you think he placed
> a lot of stock in upholding the US Constitution?
> He actively worked to CIR***VENT the protections
> guaranteed in the US Constitution, as all
> caseworkers do. =A0
What did he do to cir***vent the protections in the Constitution?
> He was undoubtedly a UNION man,
> and by default a Left Wing DEMOCRAT.
What proof do you have for that claim?
> If you think any Democrat is going to
> downsize Child Protection agencies
> I think you're kidding yourself!
>
> Don't get me wrong, the Republicans
> have failed to downsize CPS also, but
> at least idealogically it should
> be ON THEIR AGENDA along with downsizing
> government in general.
Like G W Bush did?
> You've got a choice between DEMOCRATS
> who NO WAY in HELL will restrict or downsize
> the Child Protection monster, and Republicans
> who have failed so far to live up to
> their stated agenda of smaller government.
And your point is, grag???
> How would you explain your political
> choice in relation to Child protection, Kathleen?
>
> Greg S. Hanson, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
|
