On Nov 8, 10:48=A0pm, Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:15:04 -0800 (PST), Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> =A0 =A0 I've added the Lar$on group since Lar$on used to thrive on the
> whole SRA thing. =A0He even had some books ghost-written about the
> topic. =A0Dead Air is one of them.
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> >> For a research-based rebuttal to Wikipedia=92s article, =93Satanic
Rit=
ual
> >> Abuse,=94 see The Truth about Satanic Ritual Abuse (http://
> >> ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/the-truth-about-satanic-ritual-
> >> abuse).
>
> >He says the proof is on his website, then when you
> >go to the website it says the proof is on his Youtube Video,
> >but it refers back to the web site for the proof.
>
> >Any information which fails to sup****t his crusade
> >is viewed as a conspiracy by perpetrators
> >of ritual satanic child abuse.
>
> >He described that modus operandi outright.
>
> >Does that mean that the FBI itself is perpetrators?
> >An FBI re****t from the 1980's refutes the idea of RSCA.
>
> =A0 =A0 It's not difficult to accept that some people committed acts
that
> would be consistent with a claim of SRA. =A0Given human nature, there
> are bound to be people who have done it, are doing it, and will do it.
> =A0 =A0 =A0However, it's certainly not as wide spread or organized as
som=
e,
> like Lar$on and Diana, wanted and want people to believe.
>
>
>
> >He's throwing some sort of seminars about RSCA
> >and Mind Control, but states outright that
> >doubters are not welcome and would be ejected.
>
> =A0 =A0 Which is really dumb. =A0If one actually believes something is
> happening, wouldn't it stand to reason that he would want to share the
> evidence with those who question? =A0 Converting someone who questions
> it is better than solidifying their doubt.
>
>
>
> >Who is this guy pu****ng this?
> >What is his background, motivation, etc?
>
> >Here he rails against Wikipedia and accuses
> >them of being sympathetic to perpetrators.
>
> >How big is this kooky WITCH HUNT anyway?
It's pretty much over in the USA but in the UK the SRA crap is, from
what I understand, in hysteria levels like we had in the late
eighties and early nineties.
There are a number of books out critical of the SRA myth and have
been out for a number of years.' Satanic Panic" By Jeffrey Victor is
one of them. Another book that deals more with the Christian lies
about Wicca and includes the SRA stories and shows how many of the
accounts are not to be believed is " Witch Hunts" by Kerr Cuhulain.
Cuhulain also has a series of articles (180 plus) on the same topic
area on the Witchvox web site.
There are so many areas about this " satanic ritual abuse" crap that
should rightly be heavily criticized and scrutinized. The core of
this is the fundamentalist and evangelical Christian view of "
spiritual warfare" added to their claims of alleged widespread,
organized underground satanic cults involved in child ****, widespread
human sacrifice and other crap like that. And all this with no bodies,
no remains, no child **** to prove their claims.
The not allowing dissenters or doubters to air their questions is
typical of someone who wants to brainwash his or her audience. It's
also typical of the cult leader mentality. If you are going to sell a
hysteria and profit from the fearmongering, you DON'T want the crowd
to know how flimsy your " evidence" actually is and how the subject
has been found in actual investigation to be smoke and mirrors and no
actual proof.
Yes there is an occasional, so-called " cult crime". But more often
than not it is a small group, not the centuries-old organized satanic
cults claim. And yes child molestation does happen. But guess what?
You don't have to be a " satanist" to be a child molester. In fact the
Catholic Church, among other Christian churches, has a number of
ministers who are pedophiles.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0It's very minor. =A0Most have come to realize that those who
w=
ere
> abused in a manner consistent with SRA were the victims of individual
> psychos and not a grand conspiracy.
>
> --
> A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
> Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)?
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
|
