Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Cl***** don't help children

On Nov 16, 2:47 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> > Even though the Supreme Court ruled that the state can impose
> > parenting cl***** in cases of divorce without probable cause or
> > evidence that the child is impacted in anyway.
>
> But if one thing they learn in the cl***** helps resolve an issue that
> would have involved both of their attorneys, it'll be the best $125
> they ever spent.

Because the state always knows best, according to Dan Sullivan.

> > The Court also had to
> > admit in the same breath after parents waste their time and money for
> > paying and attending parenting cl***** the parents can toss everything
> > in the garbage that was forced down their throats.
>
> How was anything "forced down their throats?"

Do you know that idiom, Dan? Really, don't be an idiot.

Andrew Usher