Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Cl***** don't help children

On Nov 17, 10:37=A0am, " krp" <kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:70fb2778-a8ef-4dd7-9cea-11bb85234937@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Nov 17, 7:25 am, " krp" <kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:82a61697-b8d3-4046-a289-e161c9d4bb90@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Nov 17, 4:32 am, " krp" <kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > Nothing is "forced down their throats" if the parents don't have
to=
 do
> > > anything they learned in the cl*****.
>
> > > Says Danny Sullivan who has never seen a state imposed "parenting
pla=
n"
> > > he didn't adore and try to SELL to people.ANY time the STATE tells
> > > people
> > > they MUST do something ... "or else" it IS cramming it down their
> > > throats.
>
> > < The subject is parenting cl*****. Because in Connecticut parenting
> > cl*****
> > are required by law.
>
> > Several states do. It is STILL "cramming it down people's throats when
> > it is not voluntary."
>
> <I still believe it's the best $125 any mother or father can spend while
> getting divorced.
>
> =A0 =A0 And WHO the fukk do you think YOU are?

Just voicing my opinion.

> Lord and master? The HALL MONITOR
> of ASCPS? Jesus Sullivan? The LORD ALMIGHTY?
> KING SULLIVAN the 21st! =A0

And there's yours!

> It may or may not be helpful. Kind of depends on
> the individuals. It could be harmful to some folks.

How could a parenting class possibly be "harmful?"

Be specific.