Talk About Network

Google





Parenting > Foster Parents > Re: CT Supreme ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 20 Topic 7360 of 7525
Post > Topic >>

Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Cl***** don't help children

by " krp" <krp34@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 18, 2008 at 08:24 AM

"Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:49221786$0$14284$607ed4bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> > > > Nothing is "forced down their throats" if the parents don't
have 
>>>>> > > > to  do
>>>>> > > anything they learned in the cl*****.
>>
>>>>> > > Says Danny Sullivan who has never seen a state imposed
"parenting 
>>>>> > > plan"
>>>>> > > he didn't adore and try to SELL to people.ANY time the STATE
tells
>>>>> > > people
>>>>> > > they MUST do something ... "or else" it IS cramming it down
their
>>>>> > > throats.
>>>>>
>>>>> > < The subject is parenting cl*****. Because in Connecticut
parenting
>>>>> > cl***** are required by law.

>>>>> > Several states do. It is STILL "cramming it down people's throats 
>>>>> > when it is not voluntary."

>>>>> <I still believe it's the best $125 any mother or father can spend 
>>>>> while
>>>>> getting divorced.

>>>>> And WHO the fukk do you think YOU are?

>>>> < Just voicing my opinion.

>>>>    No, Danny, you are PONTIFICATING.
>
>>>>> Lord and master? The HALL MONITOR of ASCPS? Jesus Sullivan? The LORD

>>>>> ALMIGHTY? KING SULLIVAN the 21st!

>>>> < And there's yours!

>>>>    I have never acted as you do like I OWNED ASCPS. That's your gig
Mr 
>>>> Bully.

>>> Poor widdle kenny ****bag!

>>    There Mr. BULLY goes again. Hey ****HEAD - who do you think you 
>> SCARE?????

>>> He thinks I'm a bully when I post that his messages about himself have

>>> nothing to do with asCPS!

>>    It's NONE of your business what I or anyone else POSTS MR BLOW HARD!

>>>>> It may or may not be helpful. Kind of depends on
>>>>> the individuals. It could be harmful to some folks.
>>>>
>>>> < How could a parenting class possibly be "harmful?"
>>>> .
>>>>    They can ignite differences that would not exist but for the 
>>>> "lectures" of high opinionates asshole like YOU who often run the 
>>>> cl***** and pepper them with their misinformation.
>>
>>> Misinformation such as? Be specific.
>>
>>    WHY? Are you giving a test?

> I just want to see if you actually have specific MISinformation in mind.

> Obviously you don't

    Well Danny lots of it really. Such as that it is ALWAYS bad to spank a

child. YOIU get an erectrion when you start lecturing on that subject.
Buit 
it is MISinformation no matter how widely it is held. AGAIN - dip**** - 
children and families do NOT come off a Henry Ford assembl;y line with 
interchangeable parts as YOPU believe they DO. What works for the Jones 
family may be a catastrophe for the Smith family EXCEPT in your dogmatic 
little world of ther GOSPEL ACCORDING TO SULLIVAN.  pbuh

>>>> The misinformation can cause MANY problems that otherwise would not 
>>>> have existed.

>>> Which misinformation?
>>
>>    ANY misinformation about child rearing.

> Such as???> Be specific.

    WHY TEACHER? Are you grading the TEST?????

>>>> Why treat a broken neck when the people have a hangnail?

>>> You consider a divorce no more serious than a hangnail?
>>
>>    In many cases it isn't. It's a sad event but in MOST divorces there
is 
>> not he acrimony that poisons the minority.

> I don't believe that's true.

    I KNOW what YOU believe Danny boy. You live in your little fantasy
world 
where you think you KNOW EVERYTHING! And you get up on your PULPIT and
start 
preaching. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO DAN SULLIVAN!  pbuh.

>>    I know that the GREAT DAN SULLIVAN thinks that there is a ONE SIZE 
>> FITS ALL standard on how to parent and HE knows it ALL!

> I never said that.

    If you don't know that is what youj are saying, Dannyboy, then you are

more stupid than I thought!

>> Too bad it doesn't work that way. We could start with your EXTREMELY 
>> STRIDENT view that spanking is always bad.
>
> I never said that spanking is always bad.

    Sure you have. You have been one of the MOST strident assholes ever 
posting on the subject. But if you have changed your mind and can see that

spanking DOES on RARE occasion have a place  with a SMALL number of kids 
then I am willing to accept your change of heart. The VAST majority of 
children are born with a conscience, but a SMALL number of kids must learn

it from the ass UP. The trouble with these CL***** is that you have a 
****load of DOGMATISTS like you conducting them. They preach a rigid 
orthodoxy where there is only ONE way of doing things.  What people are 
drenched with in most of those cl***** is FAR LEFT - Feminazi inspired 
LITURGY! I'd suggest that it is toxic to many if not most families. If you

had ever audited the cl***** one CENTRAL theme in the preaching is an 
overwhelming ANTI-MALE message.
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help children
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-11-16 08:59:55 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-11-16 12:47:33 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
"Ron" <aposi  2008-11-17 13:40:03 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
Andrew Usher <k_over_h  2008-11-16 18:48:15 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
Kent Wills <compuelf@[  2008-11-16 21:44:30 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-11-16 20:20:07 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
" krp" <krp3  2008-11-17 09:32:32 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-11-17 04:23:21 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
" krp" <krp3  2008-11-17 12:25:30 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-11-17 07:27:23 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
" krp" <krp3  2008-11-17 15:37:04 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
Dan Sullivan <dsulldan  2008-11-17 07:42:23 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
" krp" <krp3  2008-11-17 23:48:44 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
"Dan Sullivan"   2008-11-17 19:03:42 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
" krp" <krp3  2008-11-18 00:09:19 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
"Dan Sullivan"   2008-11-17 20:16:49 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
" krp" <krp3  2008-11-18 08:24:25 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-11-17 20:55:25 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
"Dan Sullivan"   2008-11-18 10:05:48 
Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Classes don't help childre
Greegor <Greegor47@[EM  2008-11-18 17:09:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 22:24:32 PST 2009.