On Nov 18, 7:02 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 7:51 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 18, 5:58 pm, " krp" <kr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > HIS SUPREME MAJESTY DANNY SULLIVAN"Dan Sullivan"
<dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >news:49232bac$0$4900$607ed4bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > >>> > > >>>> The misinformation can cause MANY problems that
otherwise would
> > > >>> > > >>>> not
> > > >>> > > >>>> have existed.
> > > >>> > >>> Which misinformation?
> > > >>> > > >> ANY misinformation about child rearing.
> > > >>> > > > Such as???> Be specific.
> > > >>> > > WHY TEACHER? Are you grading the TEST?????
>
> > > >>> > < Just seeing if you actually have an answer Obviously you
don't.
> > > >>> > I gave ONE example. The speechifying about spanking.
>
> > > >>> < That's not a specific answer.
>
> > > >>> Sure it is. Speechifying that spanking is always BAD is
MISinformation.
> > > >>> It isn't always bad.
>
> > > >> < Spanking should always be the last resort.
>
> > > >> SAYS POPE SULLIVAN.
>
> > > >> < Three swats or less on the behind with an open had to get the
attention
> > > >> of an out of control toddler.
>
> > > >> Is that in your manual? What of folks giving those parenting
cl*****
> > > >> who SAY that that is CRIMINAL CHILD ABUSE????
> > > > Post evidence that your claim is accurate and true in Connecticut
court
> > > > ordered parenting cl*****.
>
> > > Look DIP**** the parenting cl***** do NOT take place IN COURT!!!!
GOT IT?
> > > Usually by a private contractor or somebody appointed by the court.
> > > In any even a FEMINAZI!
>
> > > >>> < Speechifying spanking in reference to what?
>
> > > >>> Speechifying ABOUT spanking lecturing how EV IL it is and it is
ABUSE.
>
> > > >> < How do you know that's part of the court ordered parenting
cl***** in
> > > >> Connecticut?
>
> > > >> Danny boy - whatever the person giv ing the class says is part
of the
> > > >> course IS part of the course.
> > > > So you're simply speculating that spanking being evil is part of
the
> > > > cl*****, right, kenny boy?.
KRP > Nope too many re****ts from Dads in CT. IT SUCKS!
G > Dan, Haven't you said that parents should not
G > do services that have no basis?
DS > I suggest people only participate in necessary
DS > and appropriate services.
As defined by WHAT governmental rubber stamp?
G > Yet you sup****t the idea of making parents
G > take these parenting cl***** with no basis, right?
DS > In Connecticut it's the law.
Does that make it right, Dan? Or just expedient?
DS > In a situation where CPS has removed
DS > children from a mother and father... and
DS > no other services are necessary and
DS > appropriate... it's something they could
DS > do to demonstrate to the Judge that
DS > they're good parents.
This is about something directed automatically
for every divorce.
There isn't supposed to be a presumption of guilt.
Why would anybody have to prove they're good parents?
Is a "good parent" submissive to such crap?
Sorta the "But Dad, everone ELSE is doing it!" excuse, right?
If a parent challenges such stupid "steam roller"
laws, they're ""bad parents"", right Dan?
DS > And they could use the cl***** to show
DS > the judge that CPS was dragging their
DS > heels
The Judges here HELP CPS to drag feet.
How could the cl***** SHOW anything,
since they deliberately don't ever write
up any course completion certificate?
DS > and possibly lying about the
DS > unwillingness of the parents to cooperate.
Cooperating with each other is good.
The parenting cl***** are about whether
or not parents will SUBMIT to doing
something stupid for an alleged authority.
Yes, Dan, In the parenting course I took
there was some time spent on cooperating
with the ex and other relatives.
The advice was so SHALLOW as to be
rediculous. I asked how this works when
dealing with a malicious or mentally ill
ex/relative/agency and suddenly the
instructor was in WAY over her head!
G > Why did you break this away from the thread that it was in?
DS > I didn't.
Yes you did!
Original thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/browse_frm/thread/bb3aa74151162757
New one started by Dan Sullivan and dropping several newsgroups:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/browse_frm/thread/5e8400dbf84dbb49
First post in new thread, by Dan Sullivan:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.child-protective-services/msg/8c6a4ff6ae0c1e7f
Newsgroups: alt.sup****t.child-protective-services, misc.legal
From: Dan Sullivan <dsull...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 18 2008 10:52 am
Subject: Re: CT Supreme Court Admits Parenting Cl***** don't help
children - that's not true.
-----------------------------
|
