Our Selene/moon is wet, so to speak

Water Discovered in Moon Rock Samples / By Jeremy Hsu of Space.com
 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,380148,00.html
 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,380148,00.html#

http://space.newscientist.com/article/mg19926644.200-now-the-moon-reveals-i=
ts-water.html?DCMP=3DILC-hmts&nsref=3Dnews3_head_mg19926644.200
 =93=93They concluded the moon's mantle has between 260 and 700 ppm of
water. "This is very surprising, because for 40 years people have
studied lunar rocks and no one found any water," says Saal. "We got
lucky."=94

DARPA damage-control:
There=92s little if any scientific luck about it.  260,000 ppb or 260
ppm as found within such Lunar volcanic or lava gl***** is way more
than necessary for having accomplished good enough mass spectrometer
readings as of 50 years ago, and especially from the more recent era
of those newer than 40 year old samples, via our supposed NASA/Apollo
first hand extractions of such moon rock.

BTW;  where exactly was our DARPA cartel swarm of such crack NASA/
Apollo =93right stuff=94 hiding all of those supposed lunar =93spheres of
volcanic glass=94?  How the hell could such fundamental geology not have
been mass spectrometer analyzed until now?

I=92ll buy that our early DARPA may not have had the best capability of
detecting down to one ppb at their cloak and dagger disposal, but they
would have more than had such technology easily nailed down to at
least the resolution of detecting one ppm, and of those recently
re****ted 260 ppm readings were not even all that well hidden from
view, as some if not many of those moon rocks and glass spheres had
previously been cut and sliced every which way imaginable, as well as
supposedly having been optically magnified to the max, as well as
otherwise electron microscope viewed from every possible angle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_spectrometry
There's simply no plausible scientific way that our DARPA and of their
vast army of NASA/Apollo wizards and brown-nosed minions (working with
essentially unlimited funds and nothing but the very best of global
expertise and technology resources) could have missed such obvious
signs of lava glass sphere encapsulated water va****.  After all, it's
not like those moon rocks had Muslim WMD that never existed in the
first place.

Of course, from the unobstructed lunar orbit as well as from all of
their EVA=92s, somehow they=92d managed to entirely lose any sighting of
Venus at better than twice as bright as Earth, and better than 4 times
as bright to the unfiltered Kodak eye.

Since those mass spectrometers of sufficient resolution clearly
existed, are these DARPA folks suggesting they didn't have the
necessary heat for va****ising such small bits of lava/volcanic glass/
rock?

http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/ms/history.html
 =93The next major development was that of gas chromatography and its
coupling to mass spectrometry. This allowed, for the first time, the
analysis of mixtures of analytes without laborious separation by hand.
The development of GC-MS was the trigger for the development of modern
mass spectrometry. In 1956, the first biologically im****tant molecules
were successfully analysed.=94

Are we saying that our Zionist/Nazi DARPA was technology deprived, or
too snookered and dumbfounded to have known any better?

You folks might care to realize that uncovering such raw h2o as found
within the near perfect vacuum of space has a rather nifty ISP to
offer, and I=92m not talking about the internet service provider kind of
ISP.

Imagine, uncovering 500 ppm of essentially rocket fuel within the
volcanic/lava glass ****tions of our ****d Selene/moon surface (that=92s
500 ppm more than Mars has to offer).  It=92s like discovering the holy
grail is just hiding in plain sight, as one of the Vatican urinals.

-	Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth