"Myrl" <wisgroup_leader@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:a1e4da1e-04f0-4493-9e80-70ab6434ed85@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun 24, 2:13 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/06/23/New_pediatric_vaccine_reduc...
>
> The pediatric combination vaccine -- approved for use in infants and
> children 6 weeks through 4 years of age -- is indicated for active
> immunization against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis,
> and invasive disease due to Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib). It
> contains no thimerosal.
>
> Pentacel vaccine is approved for administration as a four-dose series
> at 2, 4, 6 and 15 to 18 months of age. The first dose may be given as
> early as 6 weeks of age.
>
> [...]
>
> Pisano said the current recommended childhood immunization schedule of
> the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta says up
> to 23 injections are needed by the time a child reaches 18 months of
> age with single-entity vaccines.
>
> However the use of the Pentacel vaccine -- already approved in Canada
> for a decade -- could reduce that number of shots by seven.
>
> -------------
>
> Cue the bleating and braying that their poor wittle, fragile, immune
> systems cannot handle this. I do not expect anyone to actually prove
> that.
That's good news! I don't think there should be any question that
benefits of vaccinating children far outweigh any risk from them. But
from a health consummer stand point, anything pharmaseudical companies
do to make vaccines safer is welcome news.
=================================
But, Myrl refused to answer if Mark S Probert is in FACT a proven
liar..............
>Andy posted his verse below ... apparently ignorant that he was the
>provoker ... not Jan.
My dictionary defines "provoker" as "someone who deliberately foments
trouble."
Posting a statement that you are going to ignore someone isn't one of
provocation, as it isn't made to "foment trouble." The statement was
posted
explicitly to avoid trouble and alleviate trouble.
Isn't it funny how someone who just accused someone else of misusing a
word
has
now been shown to have been misusing a word herself?
>Both Andy and Probert "reach out" to posters who don't go with their
>"program" in their attempts to "educate" them ... I just found a
>couple of messages from women telling me how after they posted here
>... Andy wrote them trying to "educate" them of how bad I am (LOL) ...
>nice job he has!
This is the provactive statement I referred to above, Sistah Ilena. It is
clearly provocative to make an accusation that someone has gone behind
someone
else's back to undermine their credibility and then not post any proof to
sup****t that accusation, especially when the accused person has sworn not
to
respond, and is thus unable to defend himself.
This is the kind of tactic you keep in your arsenal, and one of the
reasons
why
I could in good conscience no longer sup****t you.
So now I ask you, because Brother Langer cannot, to please share with us
your
proof of this accusation. Please, Sistah Ilena. I would like to see the
e-mails that Brother Langer sent to these women.
As Salaam Aleikum, my Sistah!
AloysiousX
****
That is Mark S Probert, Merrick,
FACT he lied.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.breast-implant/msg/822d457...
Jan 6, 2004
You know something, Sistah Ilena, I'm not Mark Probert
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/9b161d56a4...
Jun 7. 2008
path:
archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!washdc3-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!ngpeer.news.aol.com!audrey-m2.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 107
X-Admin: n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
aloysio...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(AloysiousX)
Newsgroups: alt.sup****t.breast-implant
Date: 06 Jan 2004 17:54:38 GMT
References: <19faaec.0401060908.68a7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: A New Year's Resolution
Message-ID: 20040106125438.01826.00002...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj: Is There Some Reason...> Date: 2/12/2004 2:18:07 PM Pacific
Standard
> Time> From: AloysiousX> To: JDrew63929>>> Is there some reason why you
> won't let me ask you a few questions, Jan? > I'm> really curious about
> your involvement with Ilena Rosenthal.>>> But I guess my most basic
> question is whether or not you are in California> (like I am), or over
in
> Indiana, like your profile says.>>> I had thought you were out west, but
I
> guess not.>>> As Salaam Aleikum!>>> Aloysious>
> Mark Probert markprobert1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AloysiousX
==============================
Mark Probert doesn't lie--now--does he, Myrl Jeffcoat?
Now, don't forget to answer. Another Jan Drew Troll-o Meter
is not an an answer. Btw, look on the words internet Troll.
|
