On Jun 25, 10:00=A0am, Citizen Jimserac <Jimse...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 5:13 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/06/23/New_pediatric_vaccine_reduc...
>
> > However the use of the Pentacel vaccine -- already approved in Canada
> > for a decade -- could reduce that number of shots by seven.
>
> We must applaud Mark Probert for finally admitting
> that vaccines are dangerous and that it is therefore
> of value to reduce the number of shots.
Specifically, the number of actual injections because of discomfort to
the child and site reactions, two factors I have never denied.
> Hopefully, he will eventually see the light that
> ANY vaccines have deleterious LONG TERM consequences,
That is a claim you have yet to provide one scintilla of scientific or
epidemiological evidence to sup****t, although you have been asked at
least 1000000000 times.
> something that the sup****tive re****ts, usually connected
> with the vaccine industry, don't want to speak of.
No, dinwit, wacko conspiracy crap is NOT evidence.
> It is things such as the long term use of vaccines
> on large populations, along with the unwise and
> excessive use of anti-biotics, that is weakening the
> overall health and is the principle causative factor,
> in my opinion, for the growth in certain illnesses
> and cancers.
Well, your opinion, placed on the right type of paper, could be used
to wipe up a cleanse by-product quite well. Other than that, it is
useless.
> Mr. Probert remains blissfully unaware, or worse, UNINTERESTED,
> in the long term consequences of the dangerous substances
> he advocates for routine use on the general populations
Nope, not at all. You can bleat and bray all you want, but, you are
merely proving that you are an ass.
> yet, IN A MAJOR CONTRADICTION, becomes incensed and unreasonable
Unreasonable? Moi? I am shocked. All I asked you to do was to prove
that water has memory and like cures like. Is that too hard for you?
Do you have to substitute your gibberish for a response? Are you
trying (feebly I might add) to MISDIRECT the discussion away from the
vacuous answers you post?
> when mention is made of the remarkable curative effects
> of Homeopathic medications, to this day the only
> alternative medicine system whose medications are
> regulated by the FDA.
One day we will wake up and realize that the FDA has to be given
broader powers and sharper teeth.
> In persisting in his unreasoning sup****t of dangerous
> standard therapies and in his hysterical denialism
> of Homeopathy, Mr. Probert reveals himself to be
> yet another of the "one way mirror" see things one way
> only mentalities, the ideal mentality for "one size
> fits ALL" medicine.
Actually, dimwit, your posts do a fine job of showing just how
perfectly you fit that description.
>
> Citizen Jimserac
> "Prove the Law of Similars" my dear Probert?
> Take some cinchona, observe your reaction,
> PROVE IT TO YOURSELF YOU DULLARD!
So, you admit that you cannot. Finally.
|
