Re: Amanda Peet (and the S****-oil Vigilantes) ... Vs the Medical

Mark Probert wrote:
> On Jul 20, 8:00 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> News from Ilena Rosenthal: Health Loverhttp://ilenarose.blogspot.com
>>
 >> 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/amanda-peet-vsmedical-sci_b_113817.html
>>
>> Amanda Peet vs. the Medical Establishment
>>
> 
> Factual medical do***ention left intact. Idle conjecture, ad homiem,
> and political rants removed.
> 
> oops, nothing left.
> 

Incorrect. There were no ad hominem attacks in the text. And no 
political rants either unless quoting or mentioning a politician
qualifies as a political rant. Did the previous poster read before
posting?
(link to the article restored, it was cut off by the software used by 
the previous poster)