On Jul 29, 10:37=A0pm, Mike <M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
> > On Jul 28, 11:34 pm, Mike <M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Mark Probert wrote:
> >>> On Jul 26, 12:49 pm, jurim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >>>> On Jul 25, 11:37 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 25, 1:44 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Actually=97Hannah has diagnoses of DSM-IV Autism (by JHU/KKI
> >>>>>> psychology) and mitochondrial disorder (by two metabolic
experts).=
The
> >>>>>> only =91degeneration=92 that occurred (along with 6mos of total
gr=
owth
> >>>>>> failure) after 18mos of NORMAL development followed vaccination
an=
d
> >>>>>> nothing else!" Dr. Jon Poling, MD, Ph.D,
> >>>>> Dr. Poling refuses to release Hannah's medical records, which HE
pu=
t
> >>>>> in issue when he makes claims. I wonder why?
> >>>> Dimwit Mark Probert:
> >>>> It is obvious why you could not keep your law license. You, mark,
ar=
e
> >>>> KNOWN for making totally assinine remarks, but this one takes the
> >>>> cake. =A0(1) =A0ALL of the medical records were part of the Federal
> >>>> Agency's case - so they are ALL available right now. =A0Your
stateme=
nt
> >>>> was typical of YOU.
> >>> Prove it. You cannot.
> >> What the f&ck, the government has all the records. This is a quote:
>
> >> "Medical personnel at the Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation,
> >> Department of Health and Human Services (DVIC) have reviewed the
facts
> >> of this case, as presented by the petition, MEDICAL RECORDS, and
> >> affidavits" (capitals mine)
>
> > Yes, the government has the records. No question. However, those
> > records are not publicly available.
>
> Then you omitted words "to the public" from your statement. With these
> words the statement is no longer incorrect but now it is asinine.
Asinine only if you have double standards.
Or
> assinine if you prefer. Because why in the world should Dr. Poling
> release the records to the public? You surely do not publish medical
> records of YOUR =A0children.
Dr. Poling is using his daughter to promote a medical claim without
providing the records to sup****t it.
>
> >>
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/the-vaccineautism-court-_b_=
....
> >> and numerous other sites).
>
> > Quoting Kirby gets you no where.
>
> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=3D66
> also quotes Kirby (and Kirby quotes the do***ent). Big deal.
> The point was that the records were released to the government,
> and nobody including you contests it.
You said:
ALL of the medical records were part of the Federal Agency's case - so
they are ALL available right now. Your statement
was typical of YOU.
And, now you back pedal. There is no way for anyone to independently
verify the statements, and, frankly, Kirby is a bull**** artist, bends
and flexes facts, and is not to be trusted. Dr. Poling, Hannah's
father, published a case study of her, and failed to disclose HIS
conflict of interest since he was a litigant in the Omnibus.
> >> Couldn't you make up some better sh!t ?
>
> > Nope. No need to make it up.
>
> Ok, you just did not express your sh!t correctly. It is still sh!t.-
It is only **** if you are an anti-vac liar who has double standards.
|
