Mark Probert wrote:
> On Jul 29, 10:37 pm, Mike <M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Mark Probert wrote:
>>> On Jul 28, 11:34 pm, Mike <M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Mark Probert wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 26, 12:49 pm, jurim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 25, 11:37 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 25, 1:44 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Actually—Hannah has diagnoses of DSM-IV Autism (by JHU/KKI
>>>>>>>> psychology) and mitochondrial disorder (by two metabolic
experts). The
>>>>>>>> only ‘degeneration’ that occurred (along with 6mos of total
growth
>>>>>>>> failure) after 18mos of NORMAL development followed vaccination
and
>>>>>>>> nothing else!" Dr. Jon Poling, MD, Ph.D,
>>>>>>> Dr. Poling refuses to release Hannah's medical records, which HE
put
>>>>>>> in issue when he makes claims. I wonder why?
>>>>>> Dimwit Mark Probert:
>>>>>> It is obvious why you could not keep your law license. You, mark,
are
>>>>>> KNOWN for making totally assinine remarks, but this one takes the
>>>>>> cake. (1) ALL of the medical records were part of the Federal
>>>>>> Agency's case - so they are ALL available right now. Your
statement
>>>>>> was typical of YOU.
>>>>> Prove it. You cannot.
>>>> What the f&ck, the government has all the records. This is a quote:
>>>> "Medical personnel at the Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation,
>>>> Department of Health and Human Services (DVIC) have reviewed the
facts
>>>> of this case, as presented by the petition, MEDICAL RECORDS, and
>>>> affidavits" (capitals mine)
>>> Yes, the government has the records. No question. However, those
>>> records are not publicly available.
>> Then you omitted words "to the public" from your statement. With these
>> words the statement is no longer incorrect but now it is asinine.
>
> Asinine only if you have double standards.
???
>
> Or
>> assinine if you prefer. Because why in the world should Dr. Poling
>> release the records to the public? You surely do not publish medical
>> records of YOUR children.
>
> Dr. Poling is using his daughter to promote a medical claim without
> providing the records to sup****t it.
He filed a claim with the government and released the records to the
government. End of story. The rest is you squirming because you
cannot put a spin on a simple fact.
>
>>>>
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/the-vaccineautism-court-_b_...
>>>> and numerous other sites).
>>> Quoting Kirby gets you no where.
>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=66
>> also quotes Kirby (and Kirby quotes the do***ent). Big deal.
>> The point was that the records were released to the government,
>> and nobody including you contests it.
>
> You said:
>
> ALL of the medical records were part of the Federal Agency's case - so
> they are ALL available right now. Your statement
> was typical of YOU.
I did not say that. Or are all posters the same for you?
>
> And, now you back pedal. There is no way for anyone to independently
> verify the statements,
which statements?
and, frankly, Kirby is a bull**** artist, bends
> and flexes facts, and is not to be trusted.
Your favorite site sciencebasedmedicine.org trusts him
enough regarding quoting the do***ents. The rest is not relevant
to this topic. Kirby is not relevant either. The government
had the records, there could not be a case otherwise.
> Dr. Poling, Hannah's
> father, published a case study of her, and failed to disclose HIS
> conflict of interest since he was a litigant in the Omnibus.
>
There was nothing about vaccines in the study.
>
>>>> Couldn't you make up some better sh!t ?
>>> Nope. No need to make it up.
>> Ok, you just did not express your sh!t correctly. It is still sh!t.-
>
> It is only **** if you are an anti-vac liar who has double standards.
That's really interesting. I am sup****ting Dr.Poling not releasing the
medical records of his autistic daughter to public domain, therefore
I am an anti-vac liar. Wow!
|
