Re: => 17 Catholic High School ****s in Pregnancy Pact <= Christian Family Values !

In article <g461k5$74c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) 
wrote:

> In article <x-45B713.10221628062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Larry  <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >In article <g44q4d$kfu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) 
> >wrote:
> >
> >> In article
<x-203BB3.03301428062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> Larry  <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >In article <g44p3i$ka0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) 
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In article
<x-1FE826.20491627062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> >> Larry  <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >In article <g42srv$790@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab)

> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >Now answer my question.  Is "white trash" a racist
insult or 
> >> >> >> >> >> >not?
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> Here's your answer: it depends on the speaker and the 
> >> >> >> >> >> speaker's 
> >> >> >> >> >> intent.
> >> >> >> >> >> Kinda like the "n-word."
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >"It depends"?   When Jonez makes a racist comment, and I
call 
> >> >> >> >> >him 
> >> >> >> >> >out 
> >> >> >> >> >on 
> >> >> >> >> >it, to which he admits it was a "softball" for me, you
can't 
> >> >> >> >> >being 
> >> >> >> >> >yourself to admit that your hero made a racist comment. 
When he 
> >> >> >> >> >called 
> >> >> >> >> >someone "white trash" you claim you can't tell if it is an 
> >> >> >> >> >insult 
> >> >> >> >> >or 
> >> >> >> >> >not 
> >> >> >> >> >because it depends on the speaker's intent.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> Oh, it was definitely an insult. What, are you really as 
> >> >> >> >> slow-witted 
> >> >> >> >> as 
> >> >> >> >> he 
> >> >> >> >> says?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I called it an insult from day 1.  You hemmed and hawwed and
beat 
> >> >> >> >around 
> >> >> >> >the bush until you had no option but to reluctantly admit the 
> >> >> >> >inescapable truth.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> What inescapable truth is that?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >That "white trash" is a racist insult, and Jonez used it that way
> >> >> 
> >> >> I "admit" nothing of the sort.
> >> >
> >> >So you think it is an insult, but not a racist one?
> >> >
> >> >> Here's a racist insult: Grover Norquist calling Obama "John Kerry
> >> >> with a tan." Here's another: Fox News putting the caption "Obama's
> >> >> Baby Mama" under Michelle Obama.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Got anything to say about that, Larry? Kent? Moe?
> >> >
> >> >Wow.  The "But everyone else is doing it!" defense.  Do you realize
how 
> >> >low you've sunk?
> >> 
> >> In other words, you've got nothing to say about that.
> >
> >Sure I do.  All of Those comments by Norquist and Fox News are 
> >completely and utterly unacceptable and inappropriate.  I don't know
why 
> >you'd think I would sup****t or agree with them.
> >
> >Now lets look on the other hand and some of the absurd apologetics 
> >you've pulled in the last week or so regarding your friend Jonez:
> >
> >1) You've argued that "white trash" is not a racist comment,
> >
> >2) You said I misinterpreted what Jonez said when he called for Jews to

> >be cooked in ovens,
> 
> If you say that's what he said, I don't think you misinterpreted
anything.
> I think you're flat out lying.
> 
> >3) You've dismissed as "sarcasm" his call to get kerosene and a stake 
> >ready so someone identified as a witch can be burned, and
> 
> And? It clearly was sarcasm, as I suspect you well know.
> 
> >4) When he referred to girls as "Catholic High School ****s," when they

> >obviously attended a public school, you argued he was referring to the 
> >girls, not the school.  
> 
> I pointed out the possibility.
> 
> >But when it was pointed out there was nothing to 
> >suggest the girls were Catholic, you fell silent.
> 
> There is plenty to suggest, but nothing to prove this.

See that?  An excuse for everything.  Amazing.

> 
> Ironically, you defended his claim that they were "****s,"
> on as little evidence.

We know they're teenagers, unmarried, and ***ually active.