Re: => 17 Catholic High School ****s in Pregnancy Pact <= Christian Family Values !

Deadrat wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> Larry wrote:
>>> In article <g4621f$78j@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> <x-C017F4.10292428062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Larry
>>>> <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> In article <bg7c645ndb7kudj31aat63kvg1iqci8l53@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>> Kent Wills <compuelf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:45:48 GMT, Deadrat <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I called it an insult from day 1.  You hemmed and hawwed and
>>>>>>>>>>> beat around the bush until you had no option but to
>>>>>>>>>>> reluctantly admit the inescapable truth.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What inescapable truth is that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That "white trash" is a racist insult, and Jonez used it that
>>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I "admit" nothing of the sort.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's a racist insult: Grover Norquist calling Obama "John
>>>>>>>> Kerry with a tan."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why is that racist?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      By tjab's standards, it's not.  It's simply sarcasm.
>>>>>
>>>>> No it's not, because tjab doesn't have a standard.  He has a
>>>>> double standard - one for his hero, one for everyone else.
>>>>
>>>> Let's talk about double standards, Larry. How do you figure that
>>>> Jonez calling you "white trash" is racist but Grover Norquist
>>>> calling Obama "John Kerry with a tan" is not?
>>>
>>> What is insulting or perjorative about saying Obama has similar
>>> views to John Kerry but darker skin?
>>>
>>> I'd think being compared to John Kerry is more insulting than saying
>>> he has "a tan" as shorthand for dark skin.
>>
>> And why is skin color so im****tant to racist swine like you and
>> Norquist?
>
> It's not im****tant to me.  You'll have to ask Norquist to speak for
> himself.
>
> <snip/>
>
> My favorite:
>
>> 7."How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to
>> return them to."
>>   - Golda Meir, March 8, 1969.
>
> In 1969, no one in the region would recognize Israel, let alone talk
> to Golda.
>
> <snip/>


Texas Constitution
ARTICLE VIII.

Slaves.

SEC. 1. The legislature shall have no power to pass laws for the
emancipation of 
slaves
without the consent of their owners, nor without paying their owners,
previous 
to such
emancipation, a full equivalent in money for the slaves so emancipated.

They shall have no power to prevent emigrants to this State from bringing
with 
them such persons as are deemed slaves by the laws of any of the United
States, 
so long as any person of the same age or description shall be continued in

slavery by the laws of this State: Provided, That such slave be the bona
fide 
property of such emigrants: Provided, also, That laws shall be passed to
inhibit 
the introduction into this State of slaves who have committed high crimes
in 
other States or Territories. They shall have the right to pass laws to
permit 
the owners of slaves to emancipate them, saving the rights of creditors,
and 
preventing them from becoming a public charge. They shall have full power
to 
pass laws which will oblige the owners of slaves to treat them with
humanity; to 
provide for their necessary food and clothing; to abstain from all
injuries to 
them, extending to life or limb; and, in case of their neglect or refusal
to 
comply with the directions of such laws, to have such slave or slaves
taken from 
such owner and sold for the benefit of such owner or owners. They may pass
laws 
to prevent slaves from being brought into this State as merchandise only.