Re: => 17 Catholic High School ****s in Pregnancy Pact <= Christian Family Values !

Deadrat wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:6ct469F3igignU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Larry wrote:
>>> In article <g44pac$kb2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> <x-C5C76C.20505027062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Larry
>>>> <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> In article
>>>>> <89ac84a5-1ce3-4190-b222-1dd2a05c6d6f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>> forevernitefan <fvrnite@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jun 26, 10:11 pm, Larry <x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <ikj8645hc12cm9rfhq7pqddo1qdmc9t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>> Kent Wills <compu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:08:39 -0400, Larry <x...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your turn: where do you see Jonez calling for death and/or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
>>>>>>>>>>>>> injuries to befall a group of people based on their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion, race,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or ***ual orientation?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would his post under the nym UltraMan do?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Witch arrested during new moon ritual <= get the stake and
>>>>>>>>>>>> kerosene
>>>>>>>>>>>> ready"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <5iieliF3pnbp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How will you spin it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oooh, that's a good one. I can't wait to see tjab's
>>>>>>>>>>> linguistic gymnastics to explain his way out of this one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Larry, are you truly as sarcasm-impaired as Kent? Who ties
>>>>>>>>>> your shoes
>>>>>>>>>> for you in the morning?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sarcasm, Kent! Tjab went the sarcasm route! I didn't see that
>>>>>>>>> one coming.... I expected him to go for some strange
>>>>>>>>> rationalization.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I honestly expected him to ignore it. I'm pleasantly surprised
>>>>>>>> that he's acknowledged his hero, Prof. Jonez, wrote the vile
>>>>>>>> message.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, but wanting to burn someone at the stake isn't vile,
>>>>>>> according to tjab. It's just sarcasm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So now you have it. Jonez doesn't call for death or injury to
>>>>>>>>> anyone,
>>>>>>>>> he's just being sarcastic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even if we pretend the comments tjab's hero, Prof. Jonez, has
>>>>>>>> made are sarcastic (they aren't, but let's pretend), the truth
>>>>>>>> remains that he's made them.
>>>>>>>> This means tjab's challenge has been accepted and met.
>>>>>>>> He had two options left. Admit that he's foolishly sided with a
>>>>>>>> known bigot or try to present excuses for his hero's words.
>>>>>>>> He's opted to present excuses.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Being a Wiccan/Neopagan I'm acutely aware of how some people
>>>>>> percieve people in my religion and related faiths. Dominion Now
>>>>>> Christians would love OT laws to be reenacted, and of they had
>>>>>> their way people like me would be once again burned at the stake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  If the subject header said " Black man kisses whote woman--
>>>>>> bring out the rope!" , the intent of the message would be the
>>>>>> same. It's not a joke, it's a call for violence.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course it is.  Everyone saw it as such except tjab.
>>>>
>>>> Sad that your universe ("everyone") has shrunk down to you and the
>>>> garage burglar
>>>> and compulsive liar from Iowa.
>>>
>>> And forevernitefan, whose post you were responding to, moron.  And
>>> Deadrat, who has been absolutely relentless in his mockery of Jonez
>>> over the past two or so weeks.  In other words, everyone who has
>>> chimed in, except you.
>>>
>>>
>>>> See if you can get Deadrat to endorse your moronic claim. I'm
>>>> betting you can't.
>>>
>>> Let's ask him.  Deadrat: Do you think that upon identifying a woman
>>> as a witch, encouragment to "get the stake and kerosene ready!" is a
>>> call for violence, or simply sarcasm?
>>>
>>> (Ironically, if you burned a witch at the stake in a theater, who
>>> knows what Jonez would have to say about that!)
>>
>> Well, according to legal imbeciles like you, one would not have
>> a constitutional right to shout "Burning B(W)itch!" or "Fire in the
>> Hole" if the theater was crowded.
>>
>
> And according to douches, this is a coherent contribution to
> the discourse:


"Having private savings accounts comprise a part of social security
is not the same as privatizing social security."
     -- Larry Glasser, stammering imbecile

"What do you think a "DNA Warrant" is?  There is no such thing."
              -- Larry the legal stooge

" [The Jury] might have unanimously found that he probably committed the
crime,
or likely committed them, or possibly committed them - *or* that he was in
fact
innocent."
                      --  Larry the idiot

"The jury was hung.  Whether it was hung 11 for the top count and 1
for a lesser count or 1 for the top count and 11 to acquit is of no legal
relevance in terms of bail."
            -- Larry the legal imbecile

" Actually, prisons are one of the few public places where
you can still smoke."
                    -- Larry the moron

" I don't know a single attorney, public or private,
who knows his/her attorney registration number."
                      -- Larry Glasser

 "Plus, receiving stolen money (or property of any kind) is only a
 crime if the recipient knows it is stolen"
              -- Lyin' Larry, the legal jackass


>>>> Kent Wills:  "I'm just the guy who can travel without restriction to
>>>> several Latin American countries."

>>>> UM: "Why not all the Latin American countries then, eh Kent?"

>>>> Larry the imbecile Glasser: "Federal law, dumbass.  No citizen can go
>>>> to some of the nations from the US."


Larry the Imbecile claims that 0.625 grams is "far more than a gram"
and that a handcuffed man will "fall faster" when pushed off a cliff.


>>>> Q: And just what does a moron like you think a Townhouse is, eh
jackass ?
>>>> Larry the Ignoramus: "A dwelling, which is a type of structure or
building.
>>>>                                      It is not, however, real
property."


"I never mentioned New York?  That's so demonstrably false I'm still
laughing.  Anytime I speak in anything resembling a specific, I make it
clear that I'm referring to NY statutes.  I've never claimed to know the
details of criminal statutes in other jurisdictions."
      -- Larry Glasser the Pathological Liar

Q: "So people who suffer from a medical/mental disability don't have
the "right" to defend their homes, eh comrade ?"

Larry the Legal Imbecile:  "No, they don't."