Re: => 17 Catholic High School ****s in Pregnancy Pact <= Christian Family Values !

Deadrat wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:6ct47mF3i4ul8U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Deadrat wrote:
>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>> news:6ct21kF3i9hp7U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> Deadrat wrote:
>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>> news:6cniocF3fum1nU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>> Deadrat wrote:
>>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:6cn8lhF3g4a3uU1 @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Deadrat wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Larry <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:x-C7BDA3.06494825062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <6ce455F3fur4rU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>  "Reality_Check©" <Reality@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Deadrat" <a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:kjk8k.6533$cW3.472@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Reality_Check©" <Reality@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:6cdu9qF3cr3faU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Larry" <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:x-9FB44B.18591424062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> t. ..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3rtv2$bh7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <x-FE7D03.18423424062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , Larry <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3rt0d$b9o@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <x-B3CFDF.18255924062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t> , Larry  <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3rs3q$b3e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <x-B6A3DD.18105324062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ne t> , Larry  <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3rqqj$arv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <x-E0CEAB.18271522062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> s. ne t>, Larry  <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <g3manp$9r8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tjab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (tjab)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <x-738FEB.09383522062008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ew s .net
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> , Larry  <x@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (You'll see in the same thread he makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple jokes about Jews
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cooked to death in ovens and gas chambers as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about a direct quote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kent already provided it for you, but see MID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <6b8tn5F3a2bjlU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, where he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> refers to Jews being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cooked in ovens, and says that they are tasty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when eaten with barbecue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sauce.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What you write here is just not there. But you do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a pretty sick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imagination.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was to everyone but you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have been elected to speak for everyone but me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then? I guess I owe a debt of gratitude to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "everyone" for leaving me out of that one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think Jonez meant when he said it was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> softball?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'd have to ask him. I'd call it more of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changeup, and you swung
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three times before it ever reached the plate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What I see there is you getting called on your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrisy. After all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you did defend as acceptable the proposition that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our mission in Iraq was to "crush the Sunnis and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ****ites" - well over 95% of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iraq's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> population.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't believe I once thought you were better than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonez.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell me again why you think you're better than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonez.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Virtually everyone I've seen post on this newsgroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is more rational, more intelligent, less bigoted,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> less racist, more willing to engage in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> substantive discussion, and less willing to resort to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insults and name-calling than your BFF Jonez.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't ask about "virtually everyone." I asked about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fine.  Substitute "I am" for "Virtually everyone I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seen post on this newsgroup is."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case my response is that you have an excessively
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> high opinion of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you cite examples?  I'll wait (and then point out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your hypocrisy).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <snipped: canonical nonsense>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wow, his obsession lives on.  Deadrat asks him about a
>>>>>>>>>> not-quite-insightful statement of constitutional law he made,
>>>>>>>>>> and he snips his own dumb-as-a-box-of-nails statement, and
>>>>>>>>>> responds with quotes attributed to me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In my defense,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pathetic ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But not nearly as pathetic as this:
>>>>>>
>>>>> <snipped: pathetic response snipped>
>>>>>
>>>>> But not nearly as pathetic as this:


"Having private savings accounts comprise a part of social security
is not the same as privatizing social security."
     -- Larry Glasser, stammering imbecile

"What do you think a "DNA Warrant" is?  There is no such thing."
              -- Larry the legal stooge

" [The Jury] might have unanimously found that he probably committed the
crime,
or likely committed them, or possibly committed them - *or* that he was in
fact
innocent."
                      --  Larry the idiot

"The jury was hung.  Whether it was hung 11 for the top count and 1
for a lesser count or 1 for the top count and 11 to acquit is of no legal
relevance in terms of bail."
            -- Larry the legal imbecile

" Actually, prisons are one of the few public places where
you can still smoke."
                    -- Larry the moron


" I don't know a single attorney, public or private,
who knows his/her attorney registration number."
                      -- Larry Glasser

 "Plus, receiving stolen money (or property of any kind) is only a
 crime if the recipient knows it is stolen"
              -- Lyin' Larry, the legal jackass


>>>> Kent Wills:  "I'm just the guy who can travel without restriction to
>>>> several Latin American countries."

>>>> UM: "Why not all the Latin American countries then, eh Kent?"

>>>> Larry the imbecile Glasser: "Federal law, dumbass.  No citizen can go
>>>> to some of the nations from the US."


Larry the Imbecile claims that 0.625 grams is "far more than a gram"
and that a handcuffed man will "fall faster" when pushed off a cliff.


>>>> Q: And just what does a moron like you think a Townhouse is, eh
jackass ?
>>>> Larry the Ignoramus: "A dwelling, which is a type of structure or
building.
>>>>                                      It is not, however, real
property."


"I never mentioned New York?  That's so demonstrably false I'm still
laughing.  Anytime I speak in anything resembling a specific, I make it
clear that I'm referring to NY statutes.  I've never claimed to know the
details of criminal statutes in other jurisdictions."
      -- Larry Glasser the Pathological Liar

Q: "So people who suffer from a medical/mental disability don't have
the "right" to defend their homes, eh comrade ?"

Larry the Legal Imbecile:  "No, they don't."