Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Parenting > General Kids > Review: *** and...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 3 Topic 15322 of 16392
Post > Topic >>

Review: *** and the City (** 1/2)

by "Steve Rhodes" <steve.rhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 30, 2008 at 10:28 AM

*** AND THE CITY
A film review by Steve Rhodes
Copyright 2008 Steve Rhodes

RATING (0 TO ****):  ** 1/2

"Every year, twenty million people come to New York City in search of the 
two 'l's -- labels and love," Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker) tells

us in the voice-over introduction to *** AND THE CITY, which, of course,
is 
based on the long-running HBO television series.

Although *** AND THE CITY is the ultimate chick flick -- our advanced 
screening audience was referred to only as "ladies" by the sponsors in
their 
introductions -- it is a film that will dichotomize potential viewers into

two camps, but not by gender.  The two groups are those who have seen the 
series and those who haven't.  Fans of the series, of whatever ***, are 
likely to adore the movie, as did our large and very enthusiastic
audience.

But, if you've never watched the series, as I had not, you are likely to
be 
unmoved by its movie version.  The film starts with a two to three minute 
synopsis to catch everyone up on what has been happening to the characters

since the series ended on TV, but, unless you had been watching the
series, 
this lightning fast introductory segment will just leave you dizzy and 
confused.  Too many characters; too little time.

At promo screenings of films like IRON MAN and STAR WARS, some people come

in costume.  So it was with our screening of *** AND CITY, and more people

than I've ever seen came in costume.  Here in the Silicon Valley, it's
pants 
almost all of the time for the women but not for this movie.  There were 
more dresses and fancy shoes than I've seen in a long, long time.  The
movie 
featured lots of screams by the characters at each other, and our audience

screamed right along with them.

The big event -- or should I say the big potential event -- in the story
is 
the marriage of Carrie to Mr. Big (Chris Noth), a happening which is 
chronicled in Vogue, much to Carrie's initial chagrin, under the title of 
"The Last Single Girl."  Mr. Big has two failed marriages under his belt, 
but, after dating Carrie for ten years and after breaking up with her many

times, he finally decides to pop the question.

"I wouldn't mind being married to you," Mr. Big says to Carrie in one of
the 
most unromantic proposals in cinematic history.  "Would you mind being 
married to me?"  Gosh, how could a woman turn down such a heartfelt 
outpouring of affection?

Most of the movie, however, is not about Mr. Big.  It's about Carrie and
her 
three best friends: Samantha Jones (Kim Cattrall), Charlotte York (Kristin

Davis) and Miranda Hobbes (Cynthia Nixon).  All four of them have their 
quirks, which are probably much funnier and more meaningful to followers
of 
the series.

The movie has an uneven tone, alternating between boisterous silliness and

quiet seriousness.  Filled with ***ual innuendo, the movie gave me several

smile-worthy moments, albeit no laugh-worthy ones.  One of the best lines 
occurs when Carrie explains her new hairdo to her assistant Louise
(Jennifer 
Hudson), telling her, "My head is in the witness protection program."

The movie is filled with questions probably only the series fans will care

about.  Will Carrie actually marry Mr. Big?  How will Samantha survive 
turning the big 5-0 and will she have *** with the ridiculously hot new
guy 
next door?  Will Charlotte finally get the gumption to eat something other

than prepackaged pudding while at a swank resort in Mexico?  And will the 
***less Miranda finally forgive her husband for his one-night stand?

I've got to be honest.  The film did not give me enough reason to care. 
But, I do suspect that, had I known the characters better, I could well
have 
been hooting right along with the rest of the audience.  The film is for 
presold audiences only.

*** AND THE CITY runs a surprisingly long 2:25.  It is rated R for "strong

***ual content, graphic ****ity and language" and would be acceptable for 
older teenagers.

The film opens nationwide in the United States on Friday, May 30, 2008. 
In 
the Silicon Valley, it will be showing at the AMC theaters, the Century 
theaters and the Camera Cinemas.

Web: http://www.InternetReviews.com
Email: Steve.Rhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 reviews of new films via Email?
Just write Steve.Rhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 and put "subscribe" in the 
subject line.
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Review: Sex and the City (** 1/2)
"Steve Rhodes"   2008-05-30 10:28:24 
Re: Review: Sex and the City (** 1/2)
Poweremily <power.emi@  2008-06-05 09:38:35 
Re: Review: Sex and the City (** 1/2)
Beliavsky <beliavsky@[  2008-06-05 09:52:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 19:23:18 CST 2008.