In article <XvydnVtIxPDrXvbVnZ2dnUVZ_sninZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ericka Kammerer
says...
>
>Banty wrote:
>
>>I don't understand this. Why is there this bright line drawn at a urine
test?
>>If the physician has suspicions, but the urine test is negative, if he
orders a
>> barium test, you'd say "no" then turn to assuming it's behavioral?
>
> I think you evaluate further testing on the merits.
>It is not always the beneficial to run every possible test
>to rule out every single possibility no matter how small.
Well, sure, step by step based on what is learned. No sense making this a
false
all-or-nothing thing, though.
Why, a priori, declare that only a urine test is worth pursuing in finding
or
ruling out medical issues??
Banty
|
