In article <kKudnSw0VN9FaPHVnZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, toypup says...
>
>
>
>"Banty" <Banty_member@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:g4ifj1026kg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> But that's much of the discussion right there, from the beginning of
this
>> thread. On something like this that may have a medical cause, one
*can't*
>> be
>> certain it's behavioral until a medical cause is ruled out.
>
>But some of those tests are so painful/invasive/traumatic and the
>possibility of having whatever they test for is so small and the
condition
>that they test for may be so benign, that the parent and doctor would
decide
>that it is worth checking for behavioral problems first. Note that I did
>not say all tests are painful/invasive/traumatic, but most people do try
to
>avoid those if possible.
>
But its a process of diagnosis, or rule-out diagnosis, that a parent
should go
into a proceed according to what is found and what medical professionals
have to
say. Not go in thinking they're only going a far as a first screening
test and
that''s that. Thats all I'm saying.
BTW, what invasive tests do people here imagine? Is there some kind of
urological test out there people are particularly concerned about?
Banty
|
